S-G2 FUEL DISPENSER

S-G2 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type:Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m) :6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset :Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter):Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight : 247kg.

Dimension(L×W×H): 1160*560*2215(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 27

ents on metrological management. The chapter briefly introduces fuel dispenser’s metrological management and technical requirements, appraisal related and attentions. Article I Metrological manageme fuel dispenser nt and technical requirements In accordance with The Law on Metrology of fuel dispenser’s legal management mainly includes following aspects: Model approval, initial approval, subsequent appraisal and inspection in operation. Model approval refers to an entire test, examination and assessment as to new model’s entire performance. Initial approval refers to assess whether or not the fuel dispenser made by manufacturer in accordance with the model having been ratification through a series of testing, as well as metrological performance with relative metrological rules and regulations. Initial approval really has two phases �?- approval combined with factory test, and testing appraisal after installation. Subsequent appraisal is conducted after long time since initial appraisal, from which considerable appraisal period is set down according to related requirements. Periodical appraisal is also regarded as the continued subsequent appraisal. Fuel dispenser’s measuring performance within appraisal period needs to be examined, so filling statio fuel dispenser n should d fuel dispenser eploy self-check standard instrument (no less than 20L) to examine and inspect. Apart from applied to fuel dispenser approval, JJG443-98 also adapt sample testing and pattern evaluation. Although there are two items of accuracy and flow distance ratio conducted in initial approval and subsequent evaluation, there are other technical parameters different from approval as for fuel dispenser made after passing pattern evaluation, including minimum calculated volume and minimum cubic variable. Several items reference to the pattern evaluation and sampling testing of mechanical hydraulic section of fuel dispenser as followed: Accuracy testing The testing’s purpose is to define the flow curve and verify the tolerance scope in which the allowed maximum tol

QUE　　 Date :　　POS Department　　 fuel dispenser Description SM DAC Remarques　　BF4 TRANSACTION DEBIT B0　　 MF R f rencement dune carte CB　　 26.4.3 Acqu rir la structure d une carte ?microcircuit CB B0 X　　 26.3.1 Acqu rir le code application d une carte ?microcircuit CB B0 X　　 26.4.1 Contr 磍er le code application d une carte ?microcircuit CB B0 X　　 MF R f rencement dune transaction　　 14.2.4 Contr 磍er la capacit de lapplication ?enregistrer la transaction suivante X R ception message 3 par SM　　 16.1.2 Mettre ?jour le code activation dune t l collecte fuel dispenser X　� fuel dispenser � 14.1.1 Attribuer un num ro ?la transaction de paiement X　　 5.5.2 Calculer la date et heure locales dune application X　　 1 - Ouverture Transaction　　 14.1.2 Attribuer la date et heure locales ?une transaction de paiement X　　 MF Contr 磍es dacceptabilit de la monnaie ou devise dune transaction　　 6.5.3 Contr 磍er lacceptabilit de la monnaie ou devise s lectionn e pour la transaction X　　 11.1.3 Mettre ?jour le cod

uld be, a nuclear-armed Iran would be worse. But for true believers in soft power, the point is not to support but to supplant brute force. It is a better way of managing global tensions a rival s fuel dispenser tar, not a best supporting actor. To those who think like this, the talking can never stop. Some Europeans still say that military action is inconceivable and threats of sanctions are unhelpful. This seems a characteristic European cast of mind. Nothing is ever decided. The European project is never finished. And even if something seems to have been tried and failed, there is always a chance to try—and fail?—again. The crisis with Iran has exposed rather than reconciled these transatlantic differences. They are likely to get sharper over the next few months. As Robert Kagan of the Carnegie Endowment argues, both hard and soft power have their characteristic flaws. Hard-power advocates can be too quick to pull the trigger—as, arguably, in Iraq. But for soft-power believers, there is never a trigger to pull—as, possibly, in Iran. © 2006 . Sex abusers and schools The end of innocence Jan 19th 2006 From The Economist print edition Convicted child abusers are much less dangerous than the British public—and t fuel dispenser he governm fuel dispenser ent—believe IN 2003, Paul Reeve was found to have done something illegal. Although he was not convicted of any crime, he accepted a caution from the police. He was banned from certain jobs. Then a government department reviewed Mr Reeve s case and lifted the ban. He took a job in Norwich, but quickly resigned after the police objected. It may not sound like the sort of scandal that would keep the media busy for a week and threaten the career of a government minister. But since Mr Reeve s crime involved child pornography, and his job was teaching physical education in a school, the level of panic—and the potential fallout—is almost without limit. Memories of an earlier enormity are one reason for the hysteria. In 2002, two Cambridgeshire g